Optimization of a Cantilever Beam Modeled with Solid Elements



Your Ad Here

The objective of this example is to minimize the volume of a prismatic cantilever beam. The maximum displacement at the beam tip is limited, and the 1st and 2nd eigen frequencies have a lower bound. Two subcases are defined; subcase 1 is the static load case, subcase 2 is the eigenmode analysis.

image\cantbeam1.gif

Figure 1: Cantilever beam. Loads and boundary conditions.

 

The design domain is subdivided into two design elements; the web and the flange. Six design variables are defined using the design elements and vectors (Fig.2). For shape optimization, the shape of the beam is defined using the nodal positions of the original shape image\opt-cant1.gif and a linear combination of the six shape perturbations image\opt-cant2.gif associated with the design variables. The linear factors image\opt-cant3.gif are the design variables in the optimization problem. The shape image\opt-cant4.gif of the beam appears as:

image\opt-cant5.gif.

Figure 3 shows the shape of the beam perturbed by the first design variable, which is a linear perturbation. Figure 4 shows the quadratic perturbation caused by design variable 4.

image\cantbeam2.gif

Figure 2: Cantilever beam. Design elements and design variables.

 

image\cantbeam3.gif

Figure 3: Cantilever beam. Perturbed shape number 1.

 

image\cantbeam4.gif

Figure 4: Cantilever beam. Perturbed shape number 4.

 

The perturbation vectors image\opt-cant6.gif need to be provided in the format of the DVGRID cards using AutoDV (part of Altair HyperMesh). These cards can be generated automatically. The output of AutoDV also includes the design variable definition DESVAR. The output file Beam_shape.dat can be incorporated into the Bulk Data section of the OptiStruct input deck via an include statement.

The definition of the optimization problem is included in the case control section of the input deck. Figure 5 shows the section of the OptiStruct input file that includes the definition of the optimization problem and the inclusion of the AutoDV output.

All optimization constraints are met for the model. The final shape is shown in Fig.5.

Cantilever beam. input data

$-----------------------------------------------------------------

$

$ Case Control Cards

$

$-----------------------------------------------------------------

$

DESOBJ(MIN) = 1

$

$HMNAME LOADSTEPS 1Static

$

SUBCASE 1

LOAD = 2 

SPC = 3 

DESSUB = 101 

$

$HMNAME LOADSTEPS 2Eigenvalues

$

SUBCASE 2

SPC = 3 

METHOD = 4 

DESSUB = 201 

$

BEGIN BULK

INCLUDE Beam_shape.dat

$

$ LOAD cards

$

EIGRL, 4, , , 10

$

DRESP1, 1, vol, VOLUME

DRESP1, 2, disp, DISP,,,2,,29530

DCONSTR, 101, 2, -0.01

DRESP1, 3, f1, FREQ,,,1

DRESP1, 4, f2, FREQ,,,2

DCONSTR, 202, 3, 2600.0

DCONSTR, 203, 4, 3000.0

DCONADD, 201, 202, 203

 

image\cantbeam5.gif

Figure 5: Cantilever beam. Final shape.

 

For the input file sample, see /altair/demos/os/manual/beam_shape.fem.

Go To

Example Problems for Shape Optimization

Return to Altair HyperWorks Index


Your Ad Here