(9)

We rewrite Equation (9) in a matrix form, expressed in the ground coordinate system
(10)

|
|
|
the position vector from the ground origin to the origin of the local body reference frame,  , of the flexible body, expressed in the ground coordinate system. The elements of the  vector, x, y and z, are generalized coordinates of the flexible body.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the transformation matrix from the local body reference frame of to ground. This matrix is also known as the direction cosines of the local body reference frame with respect to ground. In Adams, orientation is captured using a body fixed 3-1-3 set of Euler angles,  ,  and  . The Euler angles are generalized coordinates of the flexible body.
|
|
|
|
(11) 
where is the slice from the modal matrix that corresponds to the translational DOF of node  . The dimension of the  matrix is  where  is the number of modes. The modal coordinates  ,  are generalized coordinates of the flexible body.
|
(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

To satisfy angular constraints, Adams must instantaneously evaluate the orientation of a marker on a flexible body, as the body deforms. As the body deforms, the marker rotates through
small angles relative to its reference frame. Much like translational deformations, these angles are obtained using a modal superposition, similar to
Equation (11)
(17)

where
is the slice from the modal matrix that corresponds to the rotational DOF of node

. The dimension of the

matrix is

where

is the number of modes.
(18)

(19)

(20)

(21)

(22)

(23)

Generalized Translational Force: Since the governing equations of motion,
Equation (41), are written in the global reference frame, the generalized force on the translational coordinates is obtained by transforming

to global coordinates.
(24)

where
is given in Equation (18). The generalized translational force is independent of the point of force application.
Generalized Torque: The total torque on a flexible body, due to

and

is

where

is the position vector from the origin of the local body reference frame of the body to the point of force application. The total torque, can be written in matrix form, with respect to the ground coordinate system as:
(25)

(26)

(27)

Generalized Modal Force: The generalized modal force on a body due to applied point forces or point torques at

is obtained by projecting the load on the mode shapes.
(28)

(29)

(30)

Although distributed loads can be generated in Adams as an array of point loads, this is rarely an efficient approach. As an alternative, distributed loads can be created in Adams using the MFORCE element. The MFORCE statement allows you to apply any distributed-load vector.
(31)

Equation (31) is transformed into modal coordinates

using the modal matrix

:
(32)

(33)

The applied force is likely to have a global resultant force and torque. These show up as loads on the rigid body modes and are treated in Adams as point forces and torques on the local reference frame, as covered in the previous section. The global resultant force and torque are not discussed further.
(34)

is a computationally expensive operation, which poses a problem when
is a arbitrary function of time. Adams circumvents this problem by introducing the simplifying assumption that the spatial dependency and the time dependency can be separated, i.e., that the load can be viewed as a time varying linear combination of an arbitrary number of static load cases:
(35)

Then the expensive projection of the load to modal coordinates can be performed once during the creation of the MNF, rather than repeatedly during the Adams simulation. Adams need only be aware of the modal form of the load:
(36)

A more generous definition of
allows it to have an explicit dependency on system response, which we will denote as

, where

now represents
all the states of the system, not just those of the flexible body. The equation for the modal force can now be written as:
(37)

(38)

is exhaustive. However, due to mode truncation, in practice this is not always the case. In some cases, some amount of force remains
unprojected. We refer to this force as the residual force. One might think about this as the load that was projected on the neglected higher-order modes.
(39)

Associated with a residual force is residual vector, which can be thought of as the deformed shape of the flexible body when the residual force is applied to it. This residual vector can be treated as a mode shape and added to the Craig-Bampton modal basis. This enhanced basis completely captures the applied load. Without this enhancement, the residual force is irretrievably lost.
There is one special case of force truncation that deserves mention. This case is best illustrated by considering a FEM node with incomplete stiffness, as found on solid elements or shell elements. Applying a load to this node leads to a singularity in the FEM analysis. When Craig-Bampton modes are generated for this model, they will share a common attribute--the mode shape entry for this DOF is zero in all the modes. Consequently, any attempts in Adams to apply a load in this DOF will fail, because the load does not project on any of the modes and the structure will appear infinitely stiff. It is recommended that
no loads be applied in Adams that could not have been applied in the FEM software.
Adams supports preloaded flexible bodies. This allows Adams to support non-linear FEM analyses by accepting flexible bodies that have been linearized in a deformed state. These modes would not otherwise be considered candidates for a modal representation in Adams.
However, in certain Adams analyses the deformations of the non-linear component might safely be assumed to remain within a small range around a fixed operating point and a linearization of the body about this operating point could yield a useful modal representation of the body. A non-linear finite element model of the body is brought to this operating point by applying some combination of loads. The body is linearized at the operating point and the modes are extracted and exported to Adams.

Figure 7 illustrates the force-deformation relationship of the process described above. The undeformed state is defined by operating point

. As the body deforms, it is brought through a
non-linear path to a deformed state

. A linear model of the body at

, such as might have been defined by an Adams flexible body, would incorrectly have predicted an operating point at

rather than at

. Note further, that if the body is linearized at

, and a modal description exported to Adams in the form of a preloaded flexible body, a limited range of validity must also be observed. Fully unloading the Adams flexible body would bring it to operating point

, which is not correct.
A preload is applied in Adams in the same way modal loads described in the previous section are applied, except that the preload is not under the user’s control. The preload cannot be disabled or scaled because it is considered an immutable property of the flexible bodies with an associated deformed geometry. Only one preload can be defined for any given flexible body.
A preload is an internal load and as such only operates on the modal coordinates. There is no global resultant force. In other words, there is no load on the rigid body DOF. If this were otherwise, the flexible body would have a tendency to accelerate itself, which would be counterintuitive.
Unless the external load that gave rise to the preload is reapplied within Adams, the preloaded flexible body will recoil. If the flexible body originated from a linear finite element model, it will recoil to its undeformed shape. If the body came from a non-linear analysis, the effect will be more like that described in
Figure 7. If the body is constrained to other bodies, this tendency to recoil will cause the body to push on the other bodies.
(40)

(41)

The velocity from Equation (15) can be expressed in terms of the time derivative of the state vector

:
(42)

(43)

(44)

(45)

(46)

(47)

(48)

(49)

(50)

(51)

The inertia invariants are computed from the
nodes of the finite element model based on information about each node’s mass,

, its undeformed location

, and its participation in the component modes

. The discrete form of the inertia invariants are provided in
Table 1.
(52)

(53)

where
is the generalized stiffness matrix of the structural component with respect to the modal coordinates,

. It is not the full structural stiffness matrix of the component.
(54)

(55)

(56)

In the case of orthogonal mode shapes, the damping matrix can be effectively defined using a diagonal matrix of modal damping ratios,

. This damping ratio could be different for each of the orthogonal modes and can be conveniently defined as a ratio of the critical damping for the mode,

. Recall that the critical damping ratio is defined as the level of damping that eliminates harmonic response as seen in the following derivation. Consider the simple harmonic oscillator defined by uncoupled mode

.
(57)

where
denote, respectively, the generalized mass, the generalized stiffness, and the modal damping corresponding to mode

. Assuming the solution

, leads to a characteristic equation:
(58)

(59)

(60)

(61)

(62)

(63)
